Context Window Strategies: Building Smarter AI Prompts for Solo Developers
Stop hitting token limits and start getting better code suggestions with these proven context management techniques

You're in the zone, vibing with Claude or Cursor, building your next feature—then suddenly your AI assistant starts giving generic advice, forgetting key details you mentioned ten messages ago, or worse, suggesting code that conflicts with your existing architecture. Sound familiar?
The culprit isn't the AI—it's context window management. As solo developers, we're juggling entire codebases in conversations with AI assistants, and understanding how to work within token limits is the difference between productive flow and constant frustration.
Understanding the Context Window Reality
Every AI model has a context window—the maximum amount of text it can "remember" at once. Here's what you're working with in 2026:
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 200K tokens (~150K words or ~600 pages)
- GPT-4 Turbo: 128K tokens (~96K words or ~384 pages)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro: 1M tokens (~750K words or ~3,000 pages)
- Claude Code / Cursor: Effective context varies with tool-specific caching
Sounds like a lot, right? But here's the catch: a single medium-sized React component with imports can be 500-1,000 tokens. A full Express API route file? 2,000-3,000 tokens. Your entire conversation history with the AI? That counts too.
When you hit the limit, the AI doesn't error out—it just starts "forgetting" the oldest context, leading to suggestions that contradict your earlier work.
Strategy 1: Chunking Information Like a Pro
The biggest mistake solo developers make? Dumping entire files into the context and expecting magic. Instead, practice strategic chunking:
The Bad Way (Token Wasteful)
"Here's my entire 500-line user service file. I need to add password reset functionality."This burns 3,000+ tokens when you probably only need 300.
The Good Way (Context Efficient)
"I'm adding password reset to my Express app. Here's my existing auth structure:
Interface:
```typescript
interface UserService {
createUser(data): Promise<User>
authenticateUser(email, password): Promise<Token>
// Need: resetPassword method here
}
```
Current database schema:
```typescript
users: {
id, email, password_hash, created_at
// Need: reset_token, reset_expires fields
}
```
I need the resetPassword method to generate a secure token, save it to the DB with 1-hour expiration, and send an email. Keep the same error handling pattern as authenticateUser."Same task, 80% less tokens, clearer instructions. The AI gets exactly what it needs without wading through unrelated methods.
Strategy 2: Maintaining Multi-Session Context
Working on a feature across multiple days? Here's how to maintain context without re-explaining everything:
Create a Context Anchor
Start new sessions with a structured summary:
"Continuing work on user authentication feature. Context:
Tech stack: Next.js 14 (App Router), Prisma, PostgreSQL, JWT
Architecture: /app/api/auth/[...nextauth] using NextAuth.js
Status: Login/signup working, now adding 2FA
Key files:
- /lib/auth.ts: JWT signing/verification (DO NOT modify signature)
- /prisma/schema.prisma: User model with email, password, createdAt
- /app/api/auth/[...nextauth]/route.ts: NextAuth config
Today's task: Add TOTP-based 2FA. User should enable it in settings, requiring a verified email."This 150-token context anchor gives the AI everything it needs to provide consistent suggestions, and you can reuse it across multiple sessions.
Strategy 3: Progressive Context Building
Don't frontload all context. Build it progressively as the conversation evolves:
Round 1: High-Level Direction
"I need to add real-time notifications to my SaaS app. Users should see notifications for: new comments, mentions, system alerts. What's the best approach for a Next.js + Supabase stack?"Round 2: Refinement
"Going with Supabase Realtime. Here's my current database schema: [paste notifications table]. I need the React hook to subscribe to new notifications for the logged-in user."Round 3: Implementation Details
"The hook works but I'm getting duplicate notifications on re-renders. Here's my current implementation: [paste 30 lines]. How do I fix the subscription cleanup?"Each round adds only the context needed for that step. You're not burning tokens on implementation details when you're still deciding architecture.
Strategy 4: The Power of Examples
One well-chosen example is worth a thousand words of explanation:
Instead of:
"I use a custom error handling pattern where errors are caught in the route handler, wrapped in a standardized format with error codes, HTTP status codes, and user-friendly messages, then returned as JSON. The error codes follow a hierarchical structure..."Do this:
"Match this error handling pattern:
```typescript
catch (error) {
return NextResponse.json(
{
code: 'AUTH_001',
message: 'Invalid credentials',
details: error.message
},
{ status: 401 }
)
}
```
Apply the same pattern to the password reset endpoint."The AI instantly understands your pattern and applies it consistently.
Strategy 5: Offload Context to Files
When working in Claude Code or Cursor, leverage their ability to read files instead of pasting everything into chat:
Create Reference Documents
// project-context.md
## Tech Stack
- Next.js 14 (App Router)
- Prisma + PostgreSQL
- Tailwind CSS
- Deployed on Vercel
## Coding Conventions
- All API routes return { data, error } format
- Components use Tailwind (no inline styles)
- Server Components by default (use 'use client' sparingly)
- Error handling via error.tsx boundaries
## Database
- See /prisma/schema.prisma for models
- Use transactions for multi-step operations
- All timestamps in UTCNow you can reference this file: "Follow the conventions in project-context.md. I need a new API route for..."
Real-World Pattern: The "Context Reset"
You've been working on a feature for an hour, the conversation is 50 messages deep, and now the AI is contradicting itself. Time for a context reset:
- Start a fresh conversation (don't try to salvage the old one)
- Summarize decisions made ("We decided to use Zustand for state, WebSockets for real-time")
- Show current state (paste the working code)
- State next step clearly ("Now I need to add error reconnection logic")
This 5-minute reset saves you from hours of fighting degraded context.
Tool-Specific Tips
Claude Code
- Leverages prompt caching—repeated context (like your schema) costs 10% of normal tokens
- Can read multiple files simultaneously—reference files instead of pasting
- Use
@filesyntax to explicitly include context
Cursor
- Automatically includes surrounding code from open files
- Use
Cmd+Kfor inline edits (smaller context window) - Use chat for broader questions and architecture discussions
GitHub Copilot Chat
- Smaller context window—focus on single-file operations
- Great for explaining code, weak for multi-file refactoring
- Use
/explainand/fixcommands to save tokens
The Efficiency Checklist
Before hitting send on your next prompt, ask yourself:
- Am I including irrelevant code? (Only paste what's directly related)
- Can I show an example instead of explaining? (Code speaks louder)
- Is this a new concept or a continuation? (Anchor context for new sessions)
- Am I working within tool capabilities? (Cursor for files, Claude for architecture)
- Is my conversation getting stale? (Context reset after 30+ messages)
Level Up Your Prompting Game
Mastering context windows isn't about memorizing token counts—it's about thinking strategically:
- Chunk information to include only what's relevant right now
- Build context progressively instead of frontloading everything
- Use examples to convey patterns efficiently
- Leverage files in tools that support them
- Reset context when conversations degrade
With these strategies, you'll spend less time fighting your AI assistant and more time in flow, shipping features that vibe. The context window isn't a constraint—it's an opportunity to communicate more clearly and get better results.
Now go build something that slaps.
Want to Deploy Your AI-Powered Apps Faster?
Desplega.ai helps Spanish solo developers and startups ship AI-powered applications with automated QA, performance testing, and deployment pipelines—so you can focus on building, not debugging.
Learn MoreRelated Posts
Why Your QA Team Is Secretly Running Your Company (And Your Developers Don't Want You to Know) | desplega.ai
A satirical exposé on how QA engineers have become the unsung kingmakers in software organizations. While CTOs obsess over microservices, QA holds the keys to releases, customer satisfaction, and your weekend.
Rabbit Hole: Why Your QA Team Is Building Technical Debt (And Your Developers Know It) | desplega.ai
Hiring more QA engineers without automation strategy compounds technical debt. Learn why executive decisions about test infrastructure matter 10x more than headcount.
Rabbit Hole: TDD in AI Coding Era: Tests as Requirements
TDD transforms into strategic requirement specification for AI code generation. Tests become executable contracts that reduce defects 53% while accelerating delivery.